Humanitarian Perspectives on Civilian Shelter Guidance in Armed Conflict Zones: A Qualitative Study
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Objectives
The widespread use of explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) has become a defining feature of modern conflict, with devastating consequences for civilians. Practical guidance on civilian sheltering during explosive attacks remains limited, inconsistent, and lacking in scientific evidence. This study explored the current landscape of shelter guidance through the perspectives of humanitarian practitioners working in EWIPA contexts.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 practitioners from international NGOs, Red Cross societies, and agencies engaged in risk education, emergency response, and conflict monitoring. Participants were purposively selected for operational experience in EWIPA-affected regions. Interviews explored four domains: guidance content, information sources, dissemination channels, and implementation challenges. Data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive-deductive approach.
Results
Practitioners described a range of sheltering messages, from general cues like “find cover” to specific techniques including low-profile positioning. Most guidance drew on field experience and expert consensus rather than empirical research. Dissemination strategies varied by context. Challenges included message distortion, difficulty engaging high-risk groups, and the absence of standardized recommendations.
Conclusions
Current civilian shelter guidance in EWIPA contexts is fragmented and lacks an evidence base. Findings highlight the need for coordinated, context-specific, and evidence-informed approaches to strengthen civilian protection.
