Synergistic roles of Aquaporin 5 and Intra- and Extracellular Carbonic Anhydrases in promoting CO 2 Diffusion across the Xenopus Oocyte Plasma Membrane
Listed in
- Reading List (BiophysicsColab)
Abstract
Key Points
-
According to Fick’s law, transmembrane CO 2 flux ( J CO 2 ) is the product of membrane permeability ( P M,CO2 ) and transmembrane concentration gradient (Δ[CO 2 ]): J CO 2 = P M,CO2 Δ[CO 2 ]. Previous work separately showed that (1) human aquaporin-5 (hAQP5) enhances P M,CO2 , and (2) intracellular and (3) extracellular carbonic anhydrases (CAs) enhance Δ[CO 2 ] by consuming accumulated or replenishing lost CO 2 . We now examine interactio ns among #1–#3.
-
We assess CO 2 fluxes—produced by addition/removal of extracellular CO 2 / —using microelectrodes to monitor extracellular-surface pH (pH S ) and intracellular pH (pH i ) of Xenopus oocytes heterologously expressing hAQP5, injected with human CA II (hCA II), and/or exposed to extracellular bovine CA (bCA).
-
Enhancing effects on CO 2 fluxes are synergistic among hAQP5, hCA II, and bCA, any of which can become rate limiting, depending on the status of the other two.
-
CO 2 / addition transiently increases pH S (ΔpH S ), hCA II augments ΔpH S (ΔΔpH S ), and hAQP5 enhances ΔΔpH S (ΔΔΔpH S )—a novel tool to assess potential CO 2 channels.
CO 2 diffusion across plasma membranes depends on both membrane CO 2 permeability ( P M,CO2 ) and transmembrane CO 2 concentration gradient (Δ[CO 2 ])—Fick’s law. Human aquaporin-5 (hAQP5) accelerates CO 2 diffusion by increasing P M,CO2 , whereas carbonic anhydrases (CAs) accelerate CO 2 diffusion by enhancing CO 2 consumption/production and thus Δ[CO 2 ]. Here, we systematically assess functional interactions among a gas channel and intra-/extracellular CAs. On Day 1, we inject Xenopus oocytes with cRNA encoding hAQP5 (control: H 2 O). On Day 4, we inject hCA II protein in “Tris” buffer (control: “Tris”). We assess CO 2 fluxes by introducing extracellular 1.5% CO 2 /10 mM and using microelectrodes to measure (1) maximal extracellular-surface pH increase ΔpH S , (2) maximal rate of pH S relaxation (dpH S /dt) Max , and (3) maximal rate of intracellular-pH decrease (dpH i /dt) Max . By itself, hCA II minimally increases ΔpH S —measured “trans” to added cytosolic CA (CA i )—even at highest doses (100 ng/oocyte). However, hAQP5 alone triples ΔpH S , an effect further doubled by increasing hCA II. By itself, bovine erythrocyte CA (bCA) in the extracellular fluid doubles (dpH i /dt) Max magnitude—meas ured “trans” to added extracellular CA (CA o )—an effect further doubled by hAQP5. Note: pH measureme nts “cis” to added CAs—pH S for bCA, (dpH i /dt) Max for hCA II—are overwhelmed by enzymatical ly-produced/consumed H + , and cannot provide intuitive insight into CO 2 fluxes. Our “trans” pH measurements: (1) confirm synergy between CA o and CA i ; establish synergy between hAQP5 and both (2) CA o and (3) CA i ; and show that enhancement of ΔpH S by CA i (ΔΔpH S ) is a useful tool for assessing CO 2 permeability of membrane proteins (e.g., hAQP5).