Testing new versions of ChatGPT in terms of physiology and electrophysiology of hearing: improved accuracy but not consistency
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Introduction
ChatGPT has revolutionized many aspects of modern life, including scientific ones. Since its introduction, new versions have been introduced and advertised as having better performance. But is this true? This study aimed to assess the accuracy and consistency of six versions of ChatGPT (3.5, 4, 4o mini, 4o, 4o1 mini, and 4o1 preview). Of interest was the variability of responses given to asking the same question multiple times.
Methods
We evaluated 6 versions of ChatGPT based on their responses to 30 single-answer, multiple-choice exam questions from a 1-year course on objective methods of testing hearing. The questions were posed 10 times to each version of ChatGPT across two days (5 times each day). The accuracy of the responses was evaluated in terms of a response key. To evaluate consistency (repeatability) of the responses over time, percent agreement and Cohen’s Kappa were calculated.
Results
The overall accuracy of ChatGPT increased with each version, starting from around 53% for version 3.5 and rising to 86% for version 4o1 preview. The greatest improvement in accuracy and repeatability came with the introduction of version 4o. Repeatability progressively rose with newer releases with the exception of version 4o1 mini. While the current top version 4o1 preview has similar repeatability to 4o, the faster version, 4o1 mini, had significantly lower repeatability than the older 4o mini.
Conclusion
Newer versions of ChatGPT generally show improvement in terms of accuracy, but not in repeatability. The variability of responses is probably the current main limitation of ChatGPT for professional applications. Users must be especially careful with version 4o1 mini.
