Review of methods to derive the heartbeat-evoked potential: past practices and future directions
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
The heartbeat-evoked potential (HEP) is an implicit, electrophysiological marker of cortical heartbeat processing and interoception, with increasing clinical relevance. However, on the scalp, HEP are low-amplitude signals mixed with cardiac field artefacts (CFA), requiring signal processing pipelines to separate HEP from CFA. This review evaluates current analytical approaches, addresses methodological gaps in HEP pipelines, and examines the impact of key parameter choices.
HEP processing methods/parameters used in EEG (N=101) and MEG (N=10) studies were investigated, focusing on the effects of HEP window, electrodes, filters, independent component analysis (ICA) and artefact subspace reconstruction (ASR), on HEP extraction, using Temple University’s normal scalp EEG data.
EEG and MEG studies revealed clear inconsistencies in HEP parameter use and reporting. ASR-20 (ASR threshold for artifact identification) performed comparably to ICA for artefact removal, supporting its potential real-time EEG applicability. Epoch rejection, a HEP quality metric, appeared equivalent between ICA and ASR-20 after artefact removal. Linear Mixed Model analysis identified significant effects of RR interval, maximum epoch amplitude, HEP window and baseline correction start time on measured HEP amplitude.
Publications should report critical values for reliable HEP extraction, emphasising the need for standardised methods to enhance study comparability and reproducibility.
