Molecular Investigations of Selected Spike Protein Mutations in SARS-CoV-2: Delta and Omicron Variants and Omicron Subvariants

  1. Urmi Roy

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Among the multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants recently reported, the Delta variant has generated most perilous and widespread effects. Another variant, Omicron, has been identified specifically for its high transmissibility. Omicron contains numerous spike (S) protein mutations and in numbers much larger than those of its predecessor variants. In this report we discuss some essential structural aspects and time-based structure changes of a selected set of spike protein mutations within the Delta and Omicron variants. The expected impact of multiple-point mutations within the spike protein’s receptor-binding domain (RBD) and S1 of these variants are examined. Additionally, RBD of the more recently emerged subvariants BA.4, BA.5 and BA.2.12.1 are discussed. Within the latter group, BA.5 represents globally, the most prevalent form of SARS-CoV-2 at the present time. Temporal mutation profile for the subvariant BF.7 and currently circulating variants of interest (VOI) and variants under monitoring (VUMs) including XBB.1.5, BQ.1, BA.2.75, CH.1.1, XBB and XBF are computationally explored here briefly with the expectation that these structural data will be helpful to identify drug targets and to neutralize antibodies for the evolving variants/subvariants of SARS-CoV-2.

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484v5 on bioRxiv
  2. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484v4 on bioRxiv
  3. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484v3 on bioRxiv
  4. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484v2 on bioRxiv
  5. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  6. Version published to 10.1101/2022.05.25.493484v1 on bioRxiv