SARS-CoV-2 Delta breakthrough infections in vaccinated patients

  1. Jing Zou
  2. Xuping Xie
  3. Mingru Liu
  4. Pei-Yong Shi
  5. Ping Ren

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

The continuous emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants with increased transmission and immune evasion has caused breakthrough infections in vaccinated population. It is important to determine the threshold of neutralizing antibody titers that permit breakthrough infections. Here we tested the neutralization titers of vaccinated patients who contracted Delta variant. All 75 patients with Delta breakthrough infections exhibited neutralization titers (NT 50 ) of less than 70. Among the breakthrough patients, 76%, 18.7%, and 5.3% of them had the NT 50 ranges of <20, 20-50, and 50-69, respectively. These clinical laboratory results have implications in vaccine strategy and public health policy.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2022.04.12.488092: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2022.04.12.488092 on bioRxiv