Heteologous saRNA-Prime, DNA Dual-Antigen-Boost SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Elicits Robust Cellular Immunogenicity and Cross-Variant Neutralizing Antibodies
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
We assessed if immune responses are enhanced in CD-1 mice by heterologous vaccination with two different nucleic acid-based COVID-19 vaccines: a next-generation human adenovirus serotype 5 (hAd5)-vectored dual-antigen spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) vaccine (AdS+N) and a self-amplifying and -adjuvanted S RNA vaccine (SASA S) delivered by a nano-lipid carrier. The AdS+N vaccine encodes S modified with a fusion motif to increase cell-surface expression. The N antigen is modified with an Enhanced T-cell Stimulation Domain (N-ETSD) to direct N to the endosomal/lysosomal compartment and increase MHC class I and II stimulation potential. The S sequence in the SASA S vaccine comprises the D614G mutation, two prolines to stabilize S in the prefusion conformation, and 3 glutamines in the furin cleavage region to increase cross-reactivity across variants. CD-1 mice received vaccination by homologous and heterologous prime > boost combinations. Humoral responses to S were the highest with any regimen including the SASA S vaccine, and IgG bound to wild type and Delta (B.1.617.2) variant S1 at similar levels. An AdS+N boost of an SASA S prime particularly enhanced both CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell responses to both wild type and Delta S peptides relative to all other vaccine regimens. Sera from mice receiving SASA S homologous or heterologous vaccination were found to be highly neutralizing of all pseudovirus strains tested: Wuhan, Beta, Delta, and Omicron strain. The findings here support the clinical testing of heterologous vaccination by an SASA S > AdS+N regimen to provide increased protection against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.29.470440: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Field Sample Permit: All in vivo experiments described were carried out in strict accordance with good animal practice according to NIH recommendations.
IACUC: All procedures for animal use were approved by the IACUC Committee at Omeros, Inc. (Seattle, WA, USA) and under an approved protocol.Sex as a biological variable CD-1 female mice (Charles River Laboratories) 6-8 weeks of age were used for immunological studies performed at the vivarium facilities of Omeros Inc. (Seattle, WA). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Fluorescent-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies used for … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.11.29.470440: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics Field Sample Permit: All in vivo experiments described were carried out in strict accordance with good animal practice according to NIH recommendations.
IACUC: All procedures for animal use were approved by the IACUC Committee at Omeros, Inc. (Seattle, WA, USA) and under an approved protocol.Sex as a biological variable CD-1 female mice (Charles River Laboratories) 6-8 weeks of age were used for immunological studies performed at the vivarium facilities of Omeros Inc. (Seattle, WA). Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Fluorescent-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies used for labeling included CD8β antibody (clone H35-17.2, ThermoFisher), CD4 (clone RM4-5, BD), IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, BD), TNF-α (clone MP6-XT22, BD) and IL-2 (clone JES6-5H4; BD), and staining was performed in the presence of unlabeled anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (clone 2.4G2; BD). anti-mousesuggested: NoneCD4suggested: (BioLegend Cat# 391503, RRID:AB_2721611)IFN-γsuggested: NoneTNF-αsuggested: (Leinco Technologies Cat# T698, RRID:AB_2737572)IL-2suggested: Noneanti-CD16/CD32suggested: NoneThe cells (2-4 × 105 cells per well of a 96-well plate) were added to the ELISpot plate containing an immobilized primary antibody to either IFN-γ or IL-4 (BD Cat# 551881 and BD Cat# 551878, respectively), and were exposed to various stimuli (e.g. control peptides SIV and ConA, S-WT and N peptides pools – see catalog numbers above) at a concentration of 1-2 μg/mL peptide pools for 36-40 hours. IL-4suggested: (BD Biosciences Cat# 551878, RRID:AB_2336921)ELISA for detection of antibodies: For IgG antibody detection in inoculated mouse sera and lung homogenates, ELISAs for spike-binding (including S1 Delta) and nucleocapsid-binding antibodies and IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, and IgG3) were used. IgG1, IgG2asuggested: NoneIgG3suggested: NoneAfter incubation, the wells were washed with PBST and 100 μL of a 1/5000 dilution of anti-mouse IgG HRP (GE Health Care; Cat # NA9310V), anti-mouse IgG1 HRP (Sigma; Cat # SAB3701171), anti-mouse IgG2a HRP (Sigma; Cat # SAB3701178), anti-mouse IgG2b HRP (Sigma; catalog# SAB3701185), anti-mouse IgG3 HRP conjugated antibody (Sigma; Cat # SAB3701192), or anti-mouse IgA HRP conjugated antibody (Sigma; Cat # A4789) was added to wells. anti-mouse IgGsuggested: Noneanti-mouse IgG1suggested: Noneanti-mouse IgG2asuggested: Noneanti-mouse IgG2bsuggested: Noneanti-mouse IgG3suggested: Noneanti-mouse IgA HRPsuggested: NoneCalculation of relative ng amounts of antibodies and the Th1/Th2 IgG subclass bias: A standard curve of IgG for OD vs. ng mouse IgG was generated using purified mouse IgG (Sigma Cat #15381; absorbance values were converted into mass equivalents for both anti-S and anti-N antibodies. anti-Ssuggested: Noneanti-Nsuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Serum-virus mix was then added in duplicate to seeded hACE2 expressing HEK293 cells (BEI Resources) and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 72 hours. HEK293suggested: NoneExperimental Models: Organisms/Strains Sentences Resources Murine immunization and blood/tissue collection: The design of vaccination study performed using CD-1 mice is shown in Figure 2. CD-1suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources Fluorescent-conjugated anti-mouse antibodies used for labeling included CD8β antibody (clone H35-17.2, ThermoFisher), CD4 (clone RM4-5, BD), IFN-γ (clone XMG1.2, BD), TNF-α (clone MP6-XT22, BD) and IL-2 (clone JES6-5H4; BD), and staining was performed in the presence of unlabeled anti-CD16/CD32 antibody (clone 2.4G2; BD). ThermoFishersuggested: (ThermoFisher; SL 8; Centrifuge, RRID:SCR_020809)Flow cytometry was performed using a Beckman-Coulter Cytoflex S flow cytometer and analyzed using Flowjo Software. Flowjosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Statistical analyses and graph generation: All statistical analyses were performed and graphs generated used in figures were generated using GraphPad Prism software. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No funding statement was detected.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-