Increased aerosol transmission for B.1.1.7 (alpha variant) over lineage A variant of SARS-CoV-2

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

Airborne transmission, a term combining both large droplet and aerosol transmission, is thought to be the main transmission route of SARS-CoV-2. Here we investigated the relative efficiency of aerosol transmission of two variants of SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7 (alpha) and lineage A, in the Syrian hamster. A novel transmission caging setup was designed and validated, which allowed the assessment of transmission efficiency at various distances. At 2 meters distance, only particles <5 µm traversed between cages. In this setup, aerosol transmission was confirmed in 8 out of 8 (N = 4 for each variant) sentinels after 24 hours of exposure as demonstrated by respiratory shedding and seroconversion. Successful transmission occurred even when exposure time was limited to one hour, highlighting the efficiency of this transmission route. Interestingly, the B.1.1.7 variant outcompeted the lineage A variant in an airborne transmission chain after mixed infection of donors. Combined, this data indicates that the infectious dose of B.1.1.7 required for successful transmission may be lower than that of lineage A virus. The experimental proof for true aerosol transmission and the increase in the aerosol transmission potential of B.1.1.7 underscore the continuous need for assessment of novel variants and the development or preemptive transmission mitigation strategies.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.26.453518: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: Ethics Statement: All animal experiments were conducted in an AAALAC International-accredited facility and were approved by the Rocky Mountain Laboratories Institutional Care and Use Committee following the guidelines put forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals 8th edition, the Animal Welfare Act, United States Department of Agriculture and the United States Public Health Service Policy on the Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
    Sex as a biological variableInoculation experiments: Four to six-week-old female and male Syrian hamsters (ENVIGO) were inoculated (10 animals per virus) intranasally (I.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line AuthenticationContamination: At regular intervals mycoplasma testing was performed.
    Authentication: The airflow was adjusted for each tube length to be 30 cage changes/hour and the flow was validated prior to starting the experiments by timing a smoke plume through the tubes.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Secondary goat anti-hamster IgG Fc (horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated, Abcam) spike-specific antibodies were used for detection and visualized with KPL TMB 2-component peroxidase substrate kit (SeraCare, 5120-0047).
    Secondary goat anti-hamster IgG Fc
    suggested: None
    anti-hamster IgG
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    Virus propagation was performed in VeroE6 cells in DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, 1 mM L-glutamine, 50 U/mL penicillin and 50 μg/mL streptomycin (DMEM2).
    VeroE6
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Receptor transfection: BHK cells were seeded in black 96-well plates and transfected the next day with 100 ng plasmid DNA encoding human or hamster ACE2, using polyethylenimine (Polysciences).
    BHK
    suggested: None
    Briefly, plates pre-coated with poly-L-lysine (Sigma–Aldrich) were seed with 293T cells and transfected the following day with 1,200 ng of empty plasmid and 400 ng of plasmid encoding coronavirus spike or no-spike plasmid control (green fluorescent protein (GFP)).
    293T
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Human and hamster ACE2 (Q9BYF1.2 and GQ262794.1, respectively), were synthesized and cloned into pcDNA3.1+ (GenScript).
    pcDNA3.1+
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_117272)
    BHK cells previously transfected with ACE2 plasmid of interest were inoculated with equivalent volumes of pseudotype stocks.
    ACE2
    suggested: RRID:Addgene_164219)
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Mutagenesis to model the residues that differ in the B.1.1.7 RBD and hamster ACE2 was performed in COOT 51.
    COOT
    suggested: (Coot, RRID:SCR_014222)
    The structure figure was generated using the Pymol Molecular Graphics System (
    Pymol
    suggested: (PyMOL, RRID:SCR_000305)
    Amino acid sequence alignments of human ACE2 (BAB40370.1) and hamster ACE2 (XP_005074266.1), and of SARS-CoV-2 RBD from the linage A strain and B.1.1.7 variant, were were generated using Clustal Omega (http://europepmc.org/article/MED/).
    Clustal Omega
    suggested: (Clustal Omega, RRID:SCR_001591)
    Remaining reads were mapped to the SARS-CoV-2 2019-nCoV/USA-WA1/2020 (MN985325.1 using Bowtie2 version 2.2.928 with parameters --local --no-mixed-X 1500.
    Bowtie2
    suggested: (Bowtie 2, RRID:SCR_016368)
    PCR duplicates were removed using picard MarkDuplicates (Broad Institute) and variants were called using GATK HaplotypeCaller version 4.1.2.029 with parameter-ploidy 2.
    GATK
    suggested: (GATK, RRID:SCR_001876)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.