Relation of vaccination with severity, oxygen requirement and outcome of COVID-19 infection in Chattogram, Bangladesh

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

Introduction

Peoples all around the world are waiting for vaccination against COVID -19 infection. In Bangladesh, Astra-Zeneca (AZ) vaccine was provided, but patients had infections of SARS-COV-2 even after vaccination. We focused on observing the severity, oxygen requirement and outcome of the COVID-19 infected patients who took the first dose or completed the immunization regimen.

Methods

This is an observational study done among 174 COVID-19 patients from three COVID-19 dedicated hospitals of Chattogram, Bangladesh, who took AZ vaccines 1st dose or completed the schedule. All patients were Real-Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) positive for COVID-19. Patients were enrolled after receiving written informed consent. Suspected cases or unwilling patients were excluded from the study. Ethical approval was granted by the CMOSH–ERB. SPSS-20 was used to analyze the information gathered.

Results

Among 174 vaccinated patients, 55(31.61%) completed the vaccination schedule, and 119(68.39%) took their 1st dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Gender distributions revealed 67(38.5%) female and 107(61.5%) male got the vaccine, and 55 patients completed the full two doses, and 119 patients took the 1st dose. Most of the patients were 40 years and above. In the completed vaccination group, 33(60.0%) out of 55 in and in the first dose vaccinated group, 75(63.0%) out of 119 had a mild COVID-19, and severe and critical cases were found very minimum. Among the patients who have completed the vaccination, 32(58.2%) needed no oxygen, and who was given the first dose, 78(65%) needed no oxygen. No death occurred who completed the vaccine, and 3(2.5%) patients died who took 1st dose of the vaccine.

Conclusion

Vaccine provided in Bangladesh to the people so far seems safe and effective. Severe and critical COVID-19 is low, and the need for oxygen to admitted patients is less, and the death rate is minimal.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.06.03.21257996: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsConsent: All data were collected after written informed consent from the patients or the corresponding guardians, and ethical permission was obtained from the Chattagram Maa-Shishu O General Hospital’s ERB.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.