Live Imaging of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Mice Reveals Neutralizing Antibodies Require Fc Function for Optimal Efficacy
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) are effective in treating COVID-19 but the mechanism of immune protection is not fully understood. Here, we applied live bioluminescence imaging (BLI) to monitor the real-time effects of NAb treatment in prophylaxis and therapy of K18-hACE2 mice intranasally infected with SARS-CoV-2-nanoluciferase. We could visualize virus spread sequentially from the nasal cavity to the lungs and thereafter systemically to various organs including the brain, which culminated in death. Highly potent NAbs from a COVID-19 convalescent subject prevented, and also effectively resolved, established infection when administered within three days. In addition to direct Fab-mediated neutralization, Fc effector interactions of NAbs with monocytes, neutrophils and natural killer cells were required to effectively dampen inflammatory responses and limit immunopathology. Our study highlights that both Fab and Fc effector functions of NAbs are essential for optimal in vivo efficacy against SARS-CoV-2.
Article activity feed
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.22.436337: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IACUC: Bioluminescence Imaging (BLI) of SARS-CoV-2 infection: All standard operating procedures and protocols for IVIS imaging of SARS-CoV-2 infected animals under ABSL-3 conditions were approved by IACUC, IBSCYU and YARC. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable SARS-CoV-2 infection and treatment conditions: For all in vivo experiments, the 6 to 8 weeks male and female mice were intranasally challenged with 1 x 105 FFU in 25-30 µl volume under anesthesia (0.5 - 5 % isoflurane delivered using precision Dräger vaporizer with oxygen flow rate of 1 L/min). Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: …
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.03.22.436337: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement IACUC: Bioluminescence Imaging (BLI) of SARS-CoV-2 infection: All standard operating procedures and protocols for IVIS imaging of SARS-CoV-2 infected animals under ABSL-3 conditions were approved by IACUC, IBSCYU and YARC. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable SARS-CoV-2 infection and treatment conditions: For all in vivo experiments, the 6 to 8 weeks male and female mice were intranasally challenged with 1 x 105 FFU in 25-30 µl volume under anesthesia (0.5 - 5 % isoflurane delivered using precision Dräger vaporizer with oxygen flow rate of 1 L/min). Cell Line Authentication not detected. Table 2: Resources
Antibodies Sentences Resources Antibody depletion of immune cell subsets: For evaluating the effect of NK cell depletion during CV3-1 prophylaxis, anti-NK1.1 (clone PK136; 12.5 mg/kg body weight) or an isotype control mAb (BioXCell; clone C1.18.4; 12.5 mg/kg body weight) was administered to mice by i.p. injections every 2 days starting at 48 h before SARS-CoV-2-nLuc challenge till 8 dpi. anti-NK1.1suggested: Nonecontaining Fc blocking antibody against CD16/CD32 (BioLegend Inc) before staining with antibodies. CD16/CD32suggested: NoneGrids were incubated 1 hr with 10% calf serum in PBS to block nonspecific antibody binding, then incubated 2 hrs with anti-S antiserum (Cohen et al., 2021). anti-Ssuggested: NoneGrids were rinsed (4x 10’) with PBS then labeled for 2 hrs with 10 nm gold conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Ted Pella, Inc.). anti-mousesuggested: NoneAt 48 hours post transfection, 293T cells were stained with CV3-1 and CV3-25 antibodies (5μg/mL), using cross-reactive anti-SARS-CoV-1 Spike CR3022 or mouse anti-His tag (Sigma-Aldrich) as positive controls. CV3-25suggested: NoneAlexa Fluor-647-conjugated goat anti-human IgG (H+L) Abs (Invitrogen) and goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) Abs (Invitrogen) were used as secondary antibodies. anti-human IgGsuggested: NoneAn anti-mouse SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein (Clone 1C7, Bioss Antibodies) anti-mouse SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid proteinsuggested: NoneFollowing extensive washing with PBS, an anti-mouse IgG HRP secondary antibody solution was formulated in PBS + 1% non-fat milk. anti-mouse IgGsuggested: NoneAntibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assay: For evaluation of anti-SARS-CoV-2 ADCC activity, parental CEM. anti-SARS-CoV-2 ADCC activitysuggested: NoneExperimental Models: Cell Lines Sentences Resources Second, serially diluted clarified tissue homogenates were used to infect Vero-E6 cell culture monolayer. Vero-E6suggested: NoneUninfected monolayer of Vero cells treated identically served as controls to determine basal luciferase activity to obtain normalized relative light units. Verosuggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)Vero E6 cells were maintained in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM; Thermo Fisher, Cat. #11965–092) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco, Thermo-Fisher, Cat. #16140–071), 1% HEPES Buffer Solution (15630–130), and 1 % penicillin– streptomycin (Thermo Fisher, Cat. #15140–122). Vero E6suggested: NoneBriefly, pseudoviral particles were produced by transfecting 2×106 HEK293T cells with pNL4.3 Luc R-E- (3.5 μg), plasmids encoding for SARS-CoV-2 Spike or SARS-CoV-1 Spike (3.5 μg) protein and VSV-G (pSVCMV-IN-VSV-G, 1 μg) using the standard calcium phosphate method. HEK293Tsuggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)Briefly, 293T cells were transfected by the calcium phosphate method with the pNL4.3 R-E-Luc plasmid (NIH AIDS Reagent Program) and a plasmid encoding for SARS-CoV-2 Spike at a ratio of 5:4. 293Tsuggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)THP-1 cells were used as effector cells and were stained with another cellular dye (cell proliferation dye eFluor670). THP-1suggested: NoneSoftware and Algorithms Sentences Resources Bioluminescence Imaging (BLI) of SARS-CoV-2 infection: All standard operating procedures and protocols for IVIS imaging of SARS-CoV-2 infected animals under ABSL-3 conditions were approved by IACUC, IBSCYU and YARC. YARCsuggested: NoneImage sequences were assembled and converted to videos using Image J. Image Jsuggested: (ImageJ, RRID:SCR_003070)The images were processed using Nikon Elements AR version 4.5 software (Nikon Instruments Inc, Americas) and figures assembled with Photoshop CC and Illustrator CC (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA, USA) Photoshopsuggested: (Adobe Photoshop, RRID:SCR_014199)The data were processed and plotted using GraphPad Prism 8 v8.4.3. GraphPad Prismsuggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)FlowJo software (Treestar) was used to generate FACS plot shown in Figure S7. FlowJosuggested: (FlowJo, RRID:SCR_008520)Tomographic tilt-series and large-area montaged overviews were acquired automatically using the SerialEM software package (Mastronarde, 2005, 2008; Mastronarde and Held, 2017). SerialEMsuggested: (SerialEM, RRID:SCR_017293)Tomographic data was calculated, analyzed, and modeled using the IMOD software package (Mastronarde, 2005, 2008; Mastronarde and Held, 2017) on iMac Pro and MacPro computers (Apple, Inc. IMODsuggested: (IMOD, RRID:SCR_003297)S-MEN particles were then re-suspended in 50 mM pH 7.5 HEPES buffer, labeled with Cy3B(3S) and Cy5 derivative (LD650-CoA) and purified through an optiprep gradient as previously described (Lu et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2020; Munro et al., 2014) smFRET images of S-MEN particles was acquired on a home-built prism-based total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscope, as described previously (Lu et al., 2020). smFRET data analysis was performed using MATLAB ( MATLABsuggested: (MATLAB, RRID:SCR_001622)(MathWorks)-based customized SPARTAN software package (Juette et al., 2016). SPARTANsuggested: (SPARTAN, RRID:SCR_014901)P values were indicated as ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001; ∗∗∗∗, p < 0.0001. Schematics: Schematics for showing experimental design in figures were created with BioRender.com. BioRendersuggested: (Biorender, RRID:SCR_018361)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: Please consider improving the rainbow (“jet”) colormap(s) used on pages 65, 66, 67, 68, 62 and 63. At least one figure is not accessible to readers with colorblindness and/or is not true to the data, i.e. not perceptually uniform.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
