Evaluation of the effects of SARS-CoV-2 genetic mutations on diagnostic RT-PCR assays

  1. Takeru Nakabayashi
  2. Yuki Kawasaki
  3. Koichiro Murashima
  4. Kazuya Omi
  5. Satoshi Yuhara

Reviewed by

Read the full article

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

Several mutant strains of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) are emerging. Mismatch(es) in primer/probe binding regions would decrease the detection sensitivity of the PCR test, thereby affecting the results of clinical testing. In this study, we conducted an in silico survey on SARS-CoV-2 sequence variability within the binding regions of primer/probe published by the Japan National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). In silico analysis revealed the presence of mutations in the primer/probe binding regions. We performed RT-PCR assays using synthetic RNAs containing the mutations and showed that some mutations significantly decreased the detection sensitivity of the RT-PCR assays.

Our results highlight the importance of genomic monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 and evaluating the effects of mismatches on PCR testing sensitivity.

Article activity feed

  1. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.19.426622: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No funding statement was detected.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  2. Version published to 10.1101/2021.01.19.426622v1 on bioRxiv