The Incubation Period of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2:A Systematic Review

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

While the novel coronavirus continues to spread worldwide, the reported incubation period has varied between studies and is imprecise due to limited data. A literature search with certain selection criteria was conducted on May 30, 2020. In total, sixty-four articles were included, and 854 individual-level data were extracted from 30 studies for pooled analysis. Of these studies, 72% of them reported a median or mean incubation period of 4-7 days, while our estimated median was 4.9 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6-5.2). However, the inclusion of 81 asymptomatic and presymptomatic patients, as well as 31 cases with incubation periods exceeding 14 days, led to our estimation of 97.5 th percentile with 19.3 days (95% CI: 17.4-21.4), beyond the currently suggested 14-day quarantine period. Therefore, we appeal to prolong the quarantine duration, especially for areas that have insufficient testing resources, to protect susceptible populations from being infected.

Article Summary Line

This article reviewed the COVID-19 studies involving incubation period and provided pooled estimation based on available data from these studies.The result showed that our estimated median incubation period is consistent with the estimates of formal studies but the 97.5 percentile is larger than ever on account of including a number of asymptomatic and presymptomatic patients.These finds suggested that we should properly prolong the isolation or quarantine period in order to identify more patients with longer incubation period and those without any symptoms.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.01.20164335: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Search strategy and selection criteria: We searched “incubation period”, “COVID-19”, and their common variations (Appendix) in PubMed and Google Scholar.
    PubMed
    suggested: (PubMed, RRID:SCR_004846)
    Google Scholar
    suggested: (Google Scholar, RRID:SCR_008878)
    We did not include preprint platforms such as bioRxiv and medRxiv in our search plan due to their uncertainty of reliability (14), while instructive preprints were usually also published in regular journals later.
    bioRxiv
    suggested: (bioRxiv, RRID:SCR_003933)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.