Adopting STING agonist cyclic dinucleotides as a potential adjuvant for SARS-CoV-2 vaccine

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

A novel STING agonist CDG SF unilaterally modified with phosphorothioate and fluorine was synthesized. CDG SF displayed better STING activity over dithio CDG. Immunization of SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein with CDG SF as an adjuvant elicited an exceptional high antibody titer and a robust T cell response, which were better than the group using aluminium hydroxide as a adjuvant. These results highlighted the adjuvant potential of STING agonist in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine preparation for the first time.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.07.24.217570: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIACUC: Mice used in the experiments were raised in Animal Facility of Center of Biomedical Analysis in Tsinghua University and treated in compliance with the animal ethics guidelines.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableSARS-CoV-2 vaccines immunization: 6-8 week old Babl/c mice (4-5 mice per group, female) were separately subcutaneously vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 S protein 5 μg/mouse, CDGSF 20 μg/mouse, Alhydrogel® adjuvant 2% 100 μg/mouse.
    Cell Line AuthenticationAuthentication: Animal Facility of Center of Biomedical Analysis in Tsinghua University has been authenticated by Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care (AAALAC)

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Then, cells were harvested and strained with mouse anti-CD86-phycoerythrin antibodies (BD Pharmingen, dilution 1/200) at ice for 1h.
    anti-CD86-phycoerythrin
    suggested: None
    After washing again, diluted rabbit anti-mouse IgG-Peroxidase antibodies (1/2000 dilution, Sigma) were added to each well (100 μL per well) and incubated for 1h at 37°C.
    anti-mouse IgG-Peroxidase
    suggested: None
    After washing with PBS and PBST, isotype antibodies IgG1, IgG2a, IgG2b, IgG3, IgA and IgM (anti-mouse antibodies from goat, Sigma) were diluted to 1:1000 and added to each well (100μL per well).
    IgG2b , IgG3
    suggested: None
    IgM
    suggested: None
    anti-mouse
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    1 cell line: J774A.1 cells (mouse monocyte macrophage cell line) were cultured in DMEM (dulbecco’s modified eagle medium) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) at 37°C, 5% CO2.
    J774A.1
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: We found the following clinical trial numbers in your paper:

    IdentifierStatusTitle
    NCT02675439Active, not recruitingSafety and Efficacy of MIW815 (ADU-S100) +/- Ipilimumab in P…
    NCT03010176RecruitingStudy of MK-1454 Alone or in Combination With Pembrolizumab …


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.