Clinical utility of intracellular organisms in Gram-stained sputum in patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia.

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Introduction: Sputum cultures may detect bacteria that are not the true causative pathogens of pneumonia. In the diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia, Gram-stained sputum has demonstrated its utility. Gap statement: However, the clinical significance of intracellular organisms (ICO) observed in Gram-stained sputum has not been fully elucidated. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate whether the presence of intracellular organisms (ICO) morphologically consistent with Staphylococcus species in Gram-stained sputum specimens is associated with MRSA pneumonia diagnosis and clinical response to anti-MRSA therapy. Methodology: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted between January 2010 and December 2022. Patients who underwent sputum smear culture testing at Chiba University Hospital were included in the study. Results: Of 1,075 patients who underwent sputum testing, 65 patients with ICO were identified and matched 1:1 with 65 patients without ICO for analysis. Among these, 30 patients (46.2%) with ICO positivity were diagnosed with MRSA pneumonia, while 21 patients (32.3%) with ICO negativity were diagnosed with MRSA pneumonia. The risk difference was 13.9% (bootstrapped 95% confidence interval [CI], −3.8% to 30.5%), and this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Furthermore, in cases of pneumonia, the presence of ICO did not yield a statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of anti-MRSA medications (p = 0.32, bootstrapped 95% CI [-0.434, 0.292]). Conclusion: The presence of ICO in sputum samples was not significantly associated with MRSA pneumonia and may have limited utility in predicting clinical response to anti-MRSA therapy.

Article activity feed