Antibiotic co-resistance phenotypes as predictors of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: a multi-study analysis of transportability, lineage dependence and model explanations

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Listed in

This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.
Log in to save this article

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) frequently carries resistance to non-β-lactam antibiotics, but it is unclear how reproducibly these phenotypes indicate methicillin status across settings. From all laboratory-derived S. aureus susceptibility records in BV-BRC (45,876), we analysed 2,245 isolates from six studies with both MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, defining MRSA by mecA/mecC carriage (714 isolates); an audit against source publications found 99 mecA-positive isolates recorded as susceptible in one collection. We estimated study- and lineage-stratified associations, compared a ciprofloxacin-only rule with logistic regression and XGBoost under leave-one-study-out validation, and compared SHAP attributions with label-based importance measures. Ciprofloxacin, erythromycin and clindamycin resistance were positively associated with MRSA in every evaluable study (study-adjusted odds ratios 14.0, 11.3 and 9.2), but effect sizes were heterogeneous (I² 90–98%) and fell 57–73% after stratification by sequence type. Within three of five evaluable sequence types, ciprofloxacin was uninformative. In pooled cross-validation, XGBoost reached an AUC of 0.93 and a model given only which antibiotics had been tested 0.71. In held-out studies, ciprofloxacin alone reached AUCs of 0.88–0.98 in collections dominated by healthcare-associated lineages but 0.58 in a collection mainly from retail food; multivariable models did not consistently outperform it and were poorly calibrated. SHAP and all label-based measures ranked ciprofloxacin first, but lower SHAP ranks were unstable and partly reflected testing practice. Co-resistance phenotypes mark the MRSA lineages present in a sample, which depend on how it was collected; they are not transportable predictors of methicillin resistance and cannot substitute for cefoxitin testing.

Article activity feed