Virucidal activity of olanexidine gluconate against SARS-CoV-2
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Antiseptics have been used for infection control against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Ethanol (EtOH) was found to be effective against SARS-CoV-2, while chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) was less effective. Therefore, virucidal activity may differ between different classes of antiseptic agents. In this study, the efficacy of antiseptics against SARS-CoV-2 was evaluated, and effective agents for infection control were identified. The following antiseptics were used in this study: 1.5% olanexidine gluconate (OLG); 80% EtOH; 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaClO); 0.2% benzalkonium chloride (BKC); 1% povidone-iodine (PVP-I); 0.5%, 1% and 1.5% CHG; and 0.5% alkyldiaminoethylglycine hydrochloride (AEG). The virucidal activity was evaluated at 0, 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 min according to EN14476. After 0.5 min of exposure, 1.5% OLG, 80% EtOH, 1% NaClO, 0.2% BKC and 1% PVP-I inactivated SARS-CoV-2 below the detection limit. The virus survived in the presence of 0.5% CHG, 1% CHG or 0.5% AEG for 3 min. The virucidal activity of 1.5% CHG was insufficient after 0.5 min of exposure. The results showed that virucidal activity against SARS-CoV-2 differs depending on the class of antiseptic agents used under clean conditions. Despite belonging to the same class of biguanide antiseptics, OLG was more effective against SARS-CoV-2 than CHG.
