Identification of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria that can be associated with DFI and their therapeutic in Elnaw teaching hospital
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
This article is not in any list yet, why not save it to one of your lists.Abstract
Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is one of the public health concerns especially in the developing countries and it was considered as diabetic foot complications. Adults with diabetes mellitus represent 463 million in 2019 according to the International Diabetes Federation. The main aim of this study was to identify the anaerobic and aerobic bacteria that related to DFI and their therapeutic regimen for it among diabetic patients in Elnaw teaching hospital - Khartoum state. This study presented that there wasn’t any an anaerobic organism were isolated while the most often isolated organisms were gram negative rods (70%) which represents (65%) in case of diabetic patients. For all isolated organism S.aureus represents (30%) followed by E.coli (25%) in control group (non-diabetic), while Klebsiella.spp and S.aureus represents (20%) for each; in the clinic room isolates. Early diagnosis, optimal management and effective antibiotic therapy are necessary to prevent DFI and amputation.
Article activity feed
-
I am reaching out in regard to your Access Microbiology submission ACMI-D-23-00066R3 titled “Identification of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria that can be associated with DFI and their therapeutic in Elnaw teaching hospital.” The manuscript has now been through three rounds of revision prior to peer review, during which grammatical corrections were repeatedly requested to improve the clarity of the content. Upon review of the most recent version submitted, the manuscript is still hampered by grammatical errors throughout that make it difficult to read and understand the content. Due to these persistent grammatical issues and the obstacles that they would present for readers, manuscript ACMI-D-23-00066R3 is no longer under consideration for publication in Access Microbiology. I am sorry that we cannot proceed with publication of your …
I am reaching out in regard to your Access Microbiology submission ACMI-D-23-00066R3 titled “Identification of anaerobic and aerobic bacteria that can be associated with DFI and their therapeutic in Elnaw teaching hospital.” The manuscript has now been through three rounds of revision prior to peer review, during which grammatical corrections were repeatedly requested to improve the clarity of the content. Upon review of the most recent version submitted, the manuscript is still hampered by grammatical errors throughout that make it difficult to read and understand the content. Due to these persistent grammatical issues and the obstacles that they would present for readers, manuscript ACMI-D-23-00066R3 is no longer under consideration for publication in Access Microbiology. I am sorry that we cannot proceed with publication of your submission at this time and hope that the feedback received during the revision process will be helpful in submitting this work for publication elsewhere. Thank you for submitting your manuscript to Access Microbiology and best wishes in your future research endeavors.
-
-
The previous major revision decision issued for this manuscript listed three items that needed to be addressed before beginning the peer review process. These included: (1) Extensive grammatical corrections, as language and punctuation issues throughout the manuscript make it difficult to read and understand, (2) clarification of whether patients consented for the results of this study to be published or just to participate in the study, and (3) clarification of the gram stain methods used. The most recent submission satisfactorily expands on the gram stain methodology. However, major grammatical and language issues are still present throughout the manuscript, including the title, and there has been no clarification on patient consent for study publication. Resolution of these issues is required before the manuscript will be considered …
The previous major revision decision issued for this manuscript listed three items that needed to be addressed before beginning the peer review process. These included: (1) Extensive grammatical corrections, as language and punctuation issues throughout the manuscript make it difficult to read and understand, (2) clarification of whether patients consented for the results of this study to be published or just to participate in the study, and (3) clarification of the gram stain methods used. The most recent submission satisfactorily expands on the gram stain methodology. However, major grammatical and language issues are still present throughout the manuscript, including the title, and there has been no clarification on patient consent for study publication. Resolution of these issues is required before the manuscript will be considered suitable to undergo peer review. The assistance of a native or advanced English speaker is recommended to aid in the rewriting process. We offer a discounted translation service, Editage (https://www.editage.com/; see https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/prepare-an-article#13 for more information).
-
-
The language used throughout the manuscript is poor, resulting in ambiguity and difficulty understanding the content. Please carefully rewrite it. The assistance of a native or advanced English speaker is recommended to aid in this process. We offer a discounted translation service, Editage (https://www.editage.com/; see https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/prepare-an-article#13 for more information). This request extends to the title of the manuscript as well. The authors state that all patients included in this study provided verbal consent. However, the authors did not specify whether this included patient consent to publish the results of the study. Please clarify this in the text. The gram stain section of the methods is currently insufficient. A reference detailing the process used or a more detailed description of the staining …
The language used throughout the manuscript is poor, resulting in ambiguity and difficulty understanding the content. Please carefully rewrite it. The assistance of a native or advanced English speaker is recommended to aid in this process. We offer a discounted translation service, Editage (https://www.editage.com/; see https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/prepare-an-article#13 for more information). This request extends to the title of the manuscript as well. The authors state that all patients included in this study provided verbal consent. However, the authors did not specify whether this included patient consent to publish the results of the study. Please clarify this in the text. The gram stain section of the methods is currently insufficient. A reference detailing the process used or a more detailed description of the staining process need to be provided. This goes for the biochemical tests section as well.
-
-
-