Viral Load Among Vaccinated and Unvaccinated, Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Persons Infected With the SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
- Evaluated articles (Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases)
Abstract
We found no significant difference in cycle threshold values between vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 Delta, overall or stratified by symptoms. Given the substantial proportion of asymptomatic vaccine breakthrough cases with high viral levels, interventions, including masking and testing, should be considered in settings with elevated coronavirus disease 2019 transmission.
Article activity feed
-
Aaron Richterman
Review 1: "No Significant Difference in Viral Load Between Vaccinated and Unvaccinated, Asymptomatic and Symptomatic Groups Infected with SARS-CoV-2 Delta Variant"
-
Strength of evidence
Reviewer: A Richterman (University of Pennsylvania) | 📒📒📒 ◻️◻️
-
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264262: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: UeS: The UC San Francisco Committee on Human Research determined the study met criteria for public health surveillance.
Consent: All participants provided informed consent for testing.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication Authentication: Sequencing confirmed the variants called by genotyping. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Ct-values were calculated with FastFinder software (UgenTec | FastFinder). FastFindersuggested: NoneUeS: Individuals provided demographic data and information on symptoms immediately prior to testing using BinaxNOW™ kits. BinaxNOW™suggested: …SciScore for 10.1101/2021.09.28.21264262: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: UeS: The UC San Francisco Committee on Human Research determined the study met criteria for public health surveillance.
Consent: All participants provided informed consent for testing.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Cell Line Authentication Authentication: Sequencing confirmed the variants called by genotyping. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Ct-values were calculated with FastFinder software (UgenTec | FastFinder). FastFindersuggested: NoneUeS: Individuals provided demographic data and information on symptoms immediately prior to testing using BinaxNOW™ kits. BinaxNOW™suggested: NoneCt-values for the detection of N and E genes [8] were determined via the single threshold Cq-determination mode using Bio-Rad CFX Maestro v4.1 (Bio-Rad Inc). Bio-Rad CFX Maestrosuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-