Exposure to cough aerosols and development of pulmonary COVID-19

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

We hypothesized that most patients with severe pulmonary COVID-19 were exposed to cough aerosols. Among patients that were almost 100% certain which person infected them, only 14 out of 38 overall, and 9 out of 25 hospitalized patients requiring supplemental oxygen, were infected by someone who coughed, which did not support our hypothesis. Talking, especially with a loud voice, could be an alternative source generating SARS-CoV-2 aerosols. Further research is needed to determine how SARS-CoV-2 spreads. Avoiding to talk when you are not wearing your mask and not talking with a loud voice, ‘voice etiquette’, could be other public health interventions worthwhile exploring.

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.06.03.20121004: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: The study received a review exemption from the Ethics Committee of Antwerp University Hospital in Belgium.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Confidence intervals (CI) for proportions were calculated using MedCalc® (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).
    MedCalc
    suggested: (MedCalc, RRID:SCR_015044)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Participating patients were only asked to answer one question, which was both a strength and a limitation of our study. As with any case-control study, there is a risk of recall bias and misclassification: patients may not remember coughing as a symptom of the person who infected them. Nevertheless, a lot of the transmission did not seem to involve coughing at all. Alternatively, other respiratory maneuvers like sneezing, talking or breathing could have generated SARS-CoV-2 aerosols. When talking, vibration of the vocal cords generates 2.5-micron droplet nuclei (6). Ten seconds saying “aah” produces a comparable number of droplet nuclei as coughing for 10 seconds (7). The vocal cords are being lubricated by saliva, which contains large amounts of SARS-CoV-2 in most COVID-19 patients (8). During singing or talking with a loud voice, up to 50 times more droplet nuclei are being generated compared to talking with a quiet voice (9–10). Researchers also noticed that 1 in 5 people released 10 times more particles during talking than their peers for reasons not yet understood. Bringing all this information together, one could expect COVID-19 superspreader events in bars and clubs with loud music, choirs, and crowded markets. Lately these are increasingly being reported, in both non-scientific and scientific press. One could even argue that talking with a loud voice to hearing impaired elderly, could have contributed to the high COVID-19 incidence in nursing homes. Droplets have enou...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.