SARS-CoV-2 control on a large urban college campus without mass testing

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.01.21.21249825: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board Statementnot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Our study has limitations. Notably, since we used a random subset surveillance strategy, the total number of SARS-CoV-2 infections at Pitt is an underestimate. In addition, some students sought testing at off-campus sites. However, we worked closely with the local health department, and many of these students’ results were reported to the Pitt contact tracing team and counted. Nonetheless, some cases may have been missed. In summary, the three-pillar strategy of mitigation, communication, and containment—paired with the efficient and appropriate use of testing resources for asymptomatic students—produced effective virus control. Recent CDC guidance, as well as a report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, emphasize the need for individualized approaches for IHE and a tiered approach to testing, with mass asymptomatic testing the lowest priority 13, 22, 23. It is worth noting that the goal of IHE SARS-CoV-2 mitigation programs is to support students’ health and well-being, facilitate the educational mission, and prevent uncontrolled outbreaks. We present here a model of successful virus control in a large, urban college setting using a targeted testing strategy as opposed to a universal mass testing strategy. Student involvement was the key to success in this model.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.