Seroresponse to Third Doses of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Among Patients Receiving Maintenance Dialysis

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.03.21268549: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Ethicsnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    As previously described, beginning in January 2021, DCI physicians had the option of activating a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protocol, in which anti-spike immunoglobulin G (anti-spike IgG) antibodies were drawn monthly with routine labwork.
    anti-spike immunoglobulin G (anti-spike IgG
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    This study has limitations, including lack of data on cellular immunity and possible selection bias, both in the enrollment for antibody monitoring and for the administration of additional vaccine dose. We did not correlate antibody levels to breakthrough infections. Importantly, a major strength is that this study includes real-world results on seroresponse to additional doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. In conclusion, additional SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses elicit robust seroresponse among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, including among patients whose seroresponse has lapsed, suggesting that additional vaccine doses are critical to maximize and sustain protection of maintenance dialysis patients. In combination with omicron-variant dominance,14 we recommend that a third vaccine dose be standard for all maintenance dialysis.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.