Impact of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma lineage introduction and COVID-19 vaccination on the epidemiological landscape of a Brazilian city
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Background:
The emergence of the Brazilian variant of concern, Gamma lineage (P.1), impacted the epidemiological profile of COVID-19 cases due to its higher transmissibility rate and immune evasion ability.
Methods:
We sequenced 305 SARS-CoV-2 whole-genomes and performed phylogenetic analyses to identify introduction events and the circulating lineages. Additionally, we use epidemiological data of COVID-19 cases, severe cases, and deaths to measure the impact of vaccination coverage and mortality risk.
Results:
Here we show that Gamma introduction in São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, was followed by the displacement of seven circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants and a rapid increase in prevalence two months after its first detection in January 2021. Moreover, Gamma variant is associated with increased mortality risk and severity of COVID-19 cases in younger age groups, which corresponds to the unvaccinated population at the time.
Conclusions:
Our findings highlight the beneficial effects of vaccination indicated by a pronounced reduction of severe cases and deaths in immunized individuals, reinforcing the need for rapid and massive vaccination.
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261228: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto Institutional Review Board (IRB) (protocol number: CAE# 31588920.0.0000.5415) Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit (OSANG Healthcare, KOR) (the manufacturer does not provide sequences of the primers and probe) 34 . GeneFindersuggested: (GENEFINDER, RRID:SCR_009190)OSANG Healthcaresuggested: NoneGenome assembling and lineage analyses: The quality of FASTQ sequencing data was checked using FastQC software v0.11.9 … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261228: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto Institutional Review Board (IRB) (protocol number: CAE# 31588920.0.0000.5415) Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources GeneFinder COVID-19 Plus RealAmp Kit (OSANG Healthcare, KOR) (the manufacturer does not provide sequences of the primers and probe) 34 . GeneFindersuggested: (GENEFINDER, RRID:SCR_009190)OSANG Healthcaresuggested: NoneGenome assembling and lineage analyses: The quality of FASTQ sequencing data was checked using FastQC software v0.11.9 (http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc), and trimming was performed in Geneious Prime v. FastQCsuggested: (FastQC, RRID:SCR_014583)2021.1 (https://www.geneious.com/), using the plugin BBDuk v. https://www.geneious.com/suggested: (Geneious, RRID:SCR_010519)A minimum Phred score of Q30 35 and a minimal read length of 75 base pairs (bp) were used. Phredsuggested: (Phred, RRID:SCR_001017)The nucleotide sequences were aligned using MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7.271 38 MAFFTsuggested: (MAFFT, RRID:SCR_011811)Time-scale phylogenetic trees using the Maximum-likelihood (ML) method were reconstructed in IQ-TREE v. IQ-TREEsuggested: (IQ-TREE, RRID:SCR_017254)2.0.3 39, using the best-fit model of nucleotide substitution, according to Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), inferred by ModelFinder application 40 . ModelFindersuggested: NoneTo investigate the temporal signal from the ML tree, we regressed root-to-tip genetic distances against sample collection dates using TempEst v 1.5.1 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk) 42 TempEstsuggested: (TempEst, RRID:SCR_017304)An ordinary least squares fit was performed using Python 3.8 (https://www.python.org/) Pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)https://www.python.org/suggested: (CVXOPT - Python Software for Convex Optimization, RRID:SCR_002918)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
