Sequence Characterization and Molecular Modeling of Clinically Relevant Variants of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.15.097493: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Open reading frames in these high-quality full genomes were compared with a reference Mpro nucleotide sequence (WT, RefSeq: NC 045512.2, loc: 10,055–10,972), to extract Mpro sequences of at least 80% similarity using a script written in Python v3.7.0 (35). Pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)Full genome alignments were performed using MUSCLE (14) on the complete set of non-synonymous Mpro mutants as well as reference WT, bat, and pangolin sequences. MUSCLEsuggested: (MUSCLE, RRID:SCR_011812)Trees were generated in MEGA X (15), using the Neighbor-Joining method (37); a bootstrap test … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.05.15.097493: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
NIH rigor criteria are not applicable to paper type.Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources Open reading frames in these high-quality full genomes were compared with a reference Mpro nucleotide sequence (WT, RefSeq: NC 045512.2, loc: 10,055–10,972), to extract Mpro sequences of at least 80% similarity using a script written in Python v3.7.0 (35). Pythonsuggested: (IPython, RRID:SCR_001658)Full genome alignments were performed using MUSCLE (14) on the complete set of non-synonymous Mpro mutants as well as reference WT, bat, and pangolin sequences. MUSCLEsuggested: (MUSCLE, RRID:SCR_011812)Trees were generated in MEGA X (15), using the Neighbor-Joining method (37); a bootstrap test (38) of 1000 replicates was performed, and distances were calculated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood model (38). MEGAsuggested: (Mega BLAST, RRID:SCR_011920)Initial variant protein structures were predicted using MODELLER 9.23 (30), using the 6Y2E structure as a template; three rounds of annealing and MD refinement were performed using the “slow” optimization level for each. MODELLERsuggested: (MODELLER, RRID:SCR_008395)Table of Contents: Contentssuggested: NoneResults from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-