‘I don't want my son to be part of a giant experiment’: public attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccines in children
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Discuss this preprint
Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261252: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Ethical approval for the study was granted by Swansea University’s School of Management and College for Human and Health Sciences research ethics committees and all participants gave informed consent and had their data anonymized.
Consent: Ethical approval for the study was granted by Swansea University’s School of Management and College for Human and Health Sciences research ethics committees and all participants gave informed consent and had their data anonymized.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources 14 Coding was performed using NVivo (version … SciScore for 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261252: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Ethics IRB: Ethical approval for the study was granted by Swansea University’s School of Management and College for Human and Health Sciences research ethics committees and all participants gave informed consent and had their data anonymized.
Consent: Ethical approval for the study was granted by Swansea University’s School of Management and College for Human and Health Sciences research ethics committees and all participants gave informed consent and had their data anonymized.Sex as a biological variable not detected. Randomization not detected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Table 2: Resources
Software and Algorithms Sentences Resources 14 Coding was performed using NVivo (version 11.4.3, QRS). NVivosuggested: (NVivo, RRID:SCR_014802)Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:Limitations of this study: Strengths and limitations of the overall study have been discussed in previous publications.11,12 As with all qualitative studies, the generalizability of the findings is limited. As such, the strength of the study lies in its ability to reveal the complexity of the reasoning behind the extent to which people are supportive of COVID-19 vaccines in children, rather than in deriving proportions or gauging public sentiment overall. Additionally, due to the rapid nature of the call for participation from the participant pool, the sample size was slightly smaller than in previous rounds of data collection – although the total sample was deemed sufficient for the purposes of the analysis.
Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.
-
