SARS-CoV-2 reinfection in patients negative for immunoglobulin G following recovery from COVID-19

  1. A.M. Ali
  2. K.M. Ali
  3. M.H. Fatah
  4. H.M. Tawfeeq
  5. H.M. Rostam

Reviewed by

Read the full article See related articles

Listed in

Log in to save this article

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. Version published to 10.1016/j.nmni.2021.100926
  2. ScreenIT

    SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.20.20234385: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: Also, we confirmed that all experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Licensing Committee of the Kalar Technical Institute at the Sulaimani Polytechnic University (no. 02 on 01/08/2020).
    Consent: In addition, informed consent was obtained from all study participants or a parent and/or legal guardian if the individual was younger than 18 years of age.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variablenot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody level was assessed using a commercially available SARS-CoV-2 IgG test kit (Pishtaz Teb Diagnostics, Tehran, Iran) targeting the nucleocapsid (N) antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
    anti–SARS-CoV-2 IgG
    suggested: None

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).

    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.

    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.

    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.

    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.

  3. Version published to 10.1101/2020.11.20.20234385v1 on medRxiv