Demographic, psychological, and experiential correlates of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination intentions in a sample of Canadian families
This article has been Reviewed by the following groups
Listed in
- Evaluated articles (ScreenIT)
Abstract
No abstract available
Article activity feed
-
-
SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.04.20226050: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Forty-one participants did not advance past the consent form and 45 participants did not advance past the eligibility survey, requiring them to indicate that they were a Canadian parent of (a) child(ren) age younger than 18 years of age.
IRB: All aspects of the study were approved by the Mount Saint Vincent University Research Ethics Board (File 2019-197), abiding by the principles of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Materials: Health history: Data analysis: All data were processed and analysed using R (Vienna, Austria).Randomization Ten $50 gift cards were raffled off to randomly selected participants … SciScore for 10.1101/2020.11.04.20226050: (What is this?)
Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.
Table 1: Rigor
Institutional Review Board Statement Consent: Forty-one participants did not advance past the consent form and 45 participants did not advance past the eligibility survey, requiring them to indicate that they were a Canadian parent of (a) child(ren) age younger than 18 years of age.
IRB: All aspects of the study were approved by the Mount Saint Vincent University Research Ethics Board (File 2019-197), abiding by the principles of the Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. Materials: Health history: Data analysis: All data were processed and analysed using R (Vienna, Austria).Randomization Ten $50 gift cards were raffled off to randomly selected participants after all data were collected. Blinding not detected. Power Analysis not detected. Sex as a biological variable not detected. Table 2: Resources
No key resources detected.
Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).
Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.
Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.
Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.
Results from rtransparent:- Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
- No protocol registration statement was detected.
-
