Replicating RNA platform enables rapid response to the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant and elicits enhanced protection in naïve hamsters compared to ancestral vaccine

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2022.01.31.478520: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIACUC: Animal experiments were approved by the corresponding institutional animal care and use committee and performed by experienced personnel under veterinary oversight.
    Sex as a biological variableMouse studies: Six-to-eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (Jackson laboratory) received 1μg of each vaccine, as outlined in Figure 2A, via intramuscular injections, in a 50ul volume, on days −52, −24, 0, and 28.
    RandomizationHamsters were randomly assigned to study groups and acclimatized for several days prior to vaccination.
    BlindingSections were scored by a certified pathologist who was blinded to study groups.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    Twenty-four hours later, cell lysates were added to an ELISA plate coated with anti-SARS-CoV2 Spike (S1 domain) monoclonal antibody.
    anti-SARS-CoV2 Spike ( S1 domain )
    suggested: None
    Following a primary incubation and washes, a polyclonal anti-SARS-CoV2 Spike (full-length S) primary antibody was added.
    anti-SARS-CoV2
    suggested: None
    The secondary antibody was the Vector Laboratories ImPress VR anti-mouse IgG polymer (cat# MP-7422).
    anti-mouse IgG
    suggested: (Vector Laboratories Cat# MP-7422, RRID:AB_2336527)
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    0.1 ml of the cleaned VTM was used to infect VeroE6 cells ectopically expressing human Ace2and TMPRSS2 (VeroE6-AT cells; a gift from Dr. Barney Graham, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD) in a 48-well plate.
    VeroE6
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    The P0 stock was used to produce P1 virus stock, with virus cultures grown in VeroE6/TMPRSS2 cells (JCRB1819).
    VeroE6/TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Briefly, serial dilutions of LION/repRNA were incubated on a monolayer of BHK cells in a 96-well plate.
    BHK
    suggested: None
    Serum/virus mixtures were added, along with virus only and mock controls, to Vero E6-TMPRSS2 cells (ATCC) in 12-well plates and incubated for 30 min at 37C.
    Vero E6-TMPRSS2
    suggested: None
    Infectious virus titration: Infectious virus in swabs or tissues was quantified by tissue-culture infectious dose 50 assay (TCID50) on Vero cells.
    Vero
    suggested: CLS Cat# 605372/p622_VERO, RRID:CVCL_0059)
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    VeroE6-TMPRSS2 (JCRB1819, JCRB Cell Bank, NIBIOHN) cells were cultured at 37C in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100U/ml of penicillin-streptomycin, and 1mg/ml G418.
    VeroE6-TMPRSS2
    suggested: JCRB Cat# JCRB1819, RRID:CVCL_YQ49)
    Mouse studies: Six-to-eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (Jackson laboratory) received 1μg of each vaccine, as outlined in Figure 2A, via intramuscular injections, in a 50ul volume, on days −52, −24, 0, and 28.
    C57BL/6
    suggested: None
    Recombinant DNA
    SentencesResources
    Tiles were then synthesized on the BioXP (CodexDNA) and combined with linearized repRNA plasmid backbone in a four-fragment Gibson assembly reaction followed by transformation of e. coli and selection of clones.
    repRNA
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Statistical Analyses: Statistical analyses as described in the figure legends were performed using Prism 8.4.3 (GraphPad).
    Prism
    suggested: (PRISM, RRID:SCR_005375)
    GraphPad
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.