A Therapeutic Non-self-reactive SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Protects from Lung Pathology in a COVID-19 Hamster Model

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Discuss this preprint

Start a discussion What are Sciety discussions?

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.08.15.252320: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementConsent: SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and sample collection: The patients have given written informed consent and analyses were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin.
    IRB: SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and sample collection: The patients have given written informed consent and analyses were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin.
    RandomizationFor the SARS-CoV-2 challenge experiments, hamsters were randomly distributed into three groups: In the first group (prophylaxis group), animals received an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection of 18 mg per kg bodyweight of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing mAb CV07-209 24 hours prior to infection.
    BlindingFor histopathology, slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) followed by blinded microscopic evaluation by board-certified veterinary pathologists as previously described (Dietert et al., 2017; Osterrieder et al., 2020).
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableTwenty-seven six-week old female and male golden Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus; outbred hamster strain RjHan:AURA, Janvier Labs) were kept in groups of 3 animals in enriched, individually ventilated cages.
    Cell Line Authenticationnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Antibodies
    SentencesResources
    The first patients (CV01 (first time point), CV03, and CV05) were stained with a divergent set of antibodies: CD19-PE 1:50 (clone HIB19, BioLegend, 302207), CD38-PEcy7 1:50
    CV01
    suggested: None
    CV03
    suggested: None
    CD19-PE
    suggested: None
    CD38-PEcy7
    suggested: None
    To this end, a fusion protein (RBD-Fc) of the signal peptide of the NMDA receptor subunit GluN1, the RBD-SD1 part of SARS-CoV2-S1 (amino acids 319-591) and the constant region of rabbit IgG1 heavy chain (Fc) was expressed in HEK293T cells and immobilized onto 96-well plates from cell culture supernatant via anti-rabbit IgG (Dianova, 111-035-045) antibodies.
    anti-rabbit IgG
    suggested: (Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 111-035-045, RRID:AB_2337938)
    ACE2-HA binding was detected using anti-HA antibody HA.11 (clone 16B12, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, MMS-101P)
    anti-HA
    suggested: (Covance Cat# MMS-101P, RRID:AB_2314672)
    For experiments regarding the competition between mAbs for RBD binding, purified monoclonal antibodies were biotinylated using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-Biotin (Thermo Fisher) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    Sulfo-NHS-Biotin
    suggested: None
    For co-staining, the following antibodies were used: mouse Smooth Muscle Actin (clone 1A4, Agilent, 172
    mouse Smooth Muscle Actin
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Cell Lines
    SentencesResources
    PBMC collection and FACS staining: Recombinant SARS-CoV-2-S1 protein produced in HEK cells (Creative Diagnostics, DAGC091) was covalently labeled using CruzFluor647 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-362620) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
    HEK
    suggested: None
    For mAb expression, human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T) were transiently transfected with matching Ig heavy and light chains.
    HEK293T
    suggested: NCBI_Iran Cat# C498, RRID:CVCL_0063)
    HCoV-NL63, HCoV-HKU1, and HCoV-229E and applied mAbs at 1 µg/ml.
    HCoV-NL63
    suggested: RRID:CVCL_RW88)
    After 24 hours, transfected as well as untransfected VeroB4 cells were harvested and resuspended in DMEM/10% FCS to achieve a cell density of 2.5×105 cells/ml each.
    VeroB4
    suggested: CCLV Cat# CCLV-RIE 1146, RRID:CVCL_1912)
    HEp2 cell assay: HEp-2 cell reactivity was investigated using the NOVA Lite HEp-2 ANA Kit (Inova Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions using mAb containing culture supernatant (screening of all S1+ mAbs) or purified mAbs at 50 µg/ml (polyreactivity testing of CV07-200, CV07-209, CV07-222, CV07-255, CV07-270 and CV38-148) and examined under an inverted fluorescence microscope.
    HEp2
    suggested: None
    HEp-2
    suggested: None
    Viruses were propagated on Vero E6 cells (ATCC CRL-1586) in minimal essential medium (MEM; PAN Biotech) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAN Biotech) 100 IU/ml Penicillin G and 100 µg/ml Streptomycin (Carl Roth).
    Vero E6
    suggested: None
    Experimental Models: Organisms/Strains
    SentencesResources
    Murine tissue reactivity screening: Preparations of brain, lung, heart, liver, kidney and gut from 8-12 weeks old C57BL/6J mice were frozen in -50°C 2-methylbutane, cut on a cryostat in 20 µm sections and mounted on glass slides.
    C57BL/6J
    suggested: None
    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Cloning was considered successful when sequence identify >99.5% was given, verified by the cBASE module of BASE software.
    BASE
    suggested: (BASE, RRID:SCR_010937)
    For in vivo experiments, mAbs were concentrated using Pierce™ 3K Protein Concentrator PES (Thermo Scientific).
    Pierce™
    suggested: None
    After identification of public clonotypes, they were plotted in a Circos plot using the R package circlize (Gu et al., 2014).
    Circos
    suggested: (Circos, RRID:SCR_011798)
    Iterative model building and refinement were carried out in COOT (Emsley and Cowtan, 2004) and PHENIX (Adams et al., 2010), respectively.
    COOT
    suggested: (Coot, RRID:SCR_014222)
    PHENIX
    suggested: (Phenix, RRID:SCR_014224)
    Statistical Analysis: All statistical tests were performed using GraphPad Prism, version 8.4.
    GraphPad Prism
    suggested: (GraphPad Prism, RRID:SCR_002798)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your code and data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.