The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on College Students’ Health and Financial Stability in New York City: Findings from a Population-Based Sample of City University of New York (CUNY) Students

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2020.12.08.20246074: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    Institutional Review Board StatementIRB: The study was reviewed and approved by the CUNY School of Public Health’s Institutional Review Board (Protocol #695980); the survey began with informed consent, requiring participants to indicate consent electronically prior to starting the survey.
    Consent: The study was reviewed and approved by the CUNY School of Public Health’s Institutional Review Board (Protocol #695980); the survey began with informed consent, requiring participants to indicate consent electronically prior to starting the survey.
    RandomizationThe first 1,000 respondents received a $20 gift card for their participation by email, and five respondents among all who participated were randomly selected to receive $100 gift cards.
    BlindingFor open-ended questions or ‘other’ response categories, we identified common themes and had two independent reviewers code each quote in a blinded fashion with discussion to resolve discrepancies.
    Power Analysisnot detected.
    Sex as a biological variableThe survey comprised five domains: educational experience, household/living situation, economic impact, health impact and socio-demographic characteristics; other socio-demographic and student status data such as sex (categorized as male or female), race/ethnicity, campus and full-time or part-time student status were taken from the centralized student database.

    Table 2: Resources

    No key resources detected.


    Results from OddPub: We did not detect open data. We also did not detect open code. Researchers are encouraged to share open data when possible (see Nature blog).


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: We detected the following sentences addressing limitations in the study:
    Our study has a number of limitations. Recall bias may have affected students’ reports on general health at the beginning of the semester. We collected cross-sectional data in April 2020 prior to the first stimulus bill, which temporarily increased unemployment benefits. The financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is changing, and students may be experiencing different levels of financial instability given the temporal changes to available benefits. We had a 23% response rate, which may introduce bias in our results, even with the creation of non-response weights. Finally, our study is cross-sectional, and thus factors associated with mental health outcomes may not be causal. We note, however, that there is a plausible mechanism by which financial stressors, dealing with COVID-19 illness, being a caretaker and worries about delays in graduation could lead to poor mental health and many of the open-ended responses support the direction of these associations. Our results suggest that to mitigate the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on low-income urban college students requires a multi-pronged approach. First, universities need to ensure that students have access to campus, community and telehealth mental health services. In our study, students with anxiety/depression were more likely to report increased substance use and increased anxiety around delays to graduation, than those not experiencing anxiety/depression, highlighting the importance of reaching these students...

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.