Host transcriptional response to SARS‐CoV‐2 infection in COVID‐19 patients

This article has been Reviewed by the following groups

Read the full article See related articles

Abstract

No abstract available

Article activity feed

  1. SciScore for 10.1101/2021.05.13.443721: (What is this?)

    Please note, not all rigor criteria are appropriate for all manuscripts.

    Table 1: Rigor

    EthicsIRB: Sample preparation and sequencing: This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee to use patient samples for sequencing and all guidelines were followed.
    Sex as a biological variableThere were 11 females and 30 males in our dataset.
    Randomizationnot detected.
    Blindingnot detected.
    Power Analysisnot detected.

    Table 2: Resources

    Software and Algorithms
    SentencesResources
    Data Processing and Analysis: Raw sequencing reads were checked for quality using FASTQC v0.11.9 [41] and illumina universal adapters and low-quality reads were removed using cutadapt 2.8 [42].
    FASTQC
    suggested: (FastQC, RRID:SCR_014583)
    The processed reads were then again checked for quality using FASTQC and then mapped to the human genome GRCh38 using STAR 2.7.3a with default parameters [43].
    STAR
    suggested: (STAR, RRID:SCR_004463)
    The STAR index was generated using the GRCh38 genome and annotation gtf file downloaded from ENSEMBL [44].
    ENSEMBL
    suggested: (Ensembl, RRID:SCR_002344)
    BAM files generated were then sorted according to position using Samtools 1.10 [45].
    Samtools
    suggested: (SAMTOOLS, RRID:SCR_002105)
    The quality of BAM was assessed using QualiMap v.
    QualiMap
    suggested: (QualiMap, RRID:SCR_001209)
    Uniquely aligned reads were counted using HTSeq [48].
    HTSeq
    suggested: (HTSeq, RRID:SCR_005514)
    Differential gene expression analysis was performed using DESeq2_1.24.0 [49].
    DESeq2_1.24.0
    suggested: None
    For PCA plot and heat map, the raw read counts were rlog normalized, available with the DESeq2 package.
    DESeq2
    suggested: (DESeq, RRID:SCR_000154)
    KEGG) pathway analysis.
    KEGG
    suggested: (KEGG, RRID:SCR_012773)
    Similar enriched terms were further merged using the ‘simplify’ function of clusterProfiler with similarity cutoff set to 0.7. ‘p.adjust’ was used as a feature to select representative terms and ‘min’ was used to select features.
    clusterProfiler
    suggested: (clusterProfiler, RRID:SCR_016884)
    Bedtools closest searches for overlapping features in two bed files.
    Bedtools
    suggested: (BEDTools, RRID:SCR_006646)

    Results from OddPub: Thank you for sharing your data.


    Results from LimitationRecognizer: An explicit section about the limitations of the techniques employed in this study was not found. We encourage authors to address study limitations.

    Results from TrialIdentifier: No clinical trial numbers were referenced.


    Results from Barzooka: We did not find any issues relating to the usage of bar graphs.


    Results from JetFighter: We did not find any issues relating to colormaps.


    Results from rtransparent:
    • Thank you for including a conflict of interest statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • Thank you for including a funding statement. Authors are encouraged to include this statement when submitting to a journal.
    • No protocol registration statement was detected.

    Results from scite Reference Check: We found no unreliable references.


    About SciScore

    SciScore is an automated tool that is designed to assist expert reviewers by finding and presenting formulaic information scattered throughout a paper in a standard, easy to digest format. SciScore checks for the presence and correctness of RRIDs (research resource identifiers), and for rigor criteria such as sex and investigator blinding. For details on the theoretical underpinning of rigor criteria and the tools shown here, including references cited, please follow this link.