ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Work-Related and Personal Factors Associated With Mental Well-Being During the COVID-19 Response: Survey of Health Care and Other Workers
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Among the General Population During COVID-19 Outbreak in Iran: A National Cross-Sectional Online Survey
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Adaptive Time-Dependent Priors and Bayesian Inference to Evaluate SARS-CoV-2 Public Health Measures Validated on 31 Countries
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using machine learning to predict COVID-19 infection and severity risk among 4510 aged adults: a UK Biobank cohort study
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Bayesian investigation of SARS-CoV-2-related mortality in France
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Evaluation of the number of undiagnosed infected in an outbreak using source of infection measurements
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling the Transmission of Respiratory Infectious Diseases in Mass Transportation Systems
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 and associations with frailty and multimorbidity: a prospective analysis of UK Biobank participants
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Poorly known aspects of flattening the curve of COVID-19
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Estimating force of infection from serologic surveys with imperfect tests
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT