ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Evidence for Aerosol Transfer of SARS-CoV2-specific Humoral Immunity
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect access to condoms, chlamydia and HIV testing, and cervical cancer screening at a population level in Britain? (Natsal-COVID)
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Effectiveness of ChAdOx1-S COVID-19 booster vaccination against the Omicron and Delta variants in England
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Promising Efficacy of a Third Dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Treated with Anti-CD20 Antibody Who Failed 2-Dose Vaccination
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Multi-omics identify LRRC15 as a COVID-19 severity predictor and persistent pro-thrombotic signals in convalescence
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Vaccine Stockpile Sharing For Selfish Objectives
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A Novel Y-Shaped, S-O-N-O-S-Bridged Crosslink between Three Residues C22, C44, and K61 Is a Redox Switch of the SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical Features and Outcomes of COVID-19 at a Teaching Hospital in Kingston, Jamaica
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A Solution to the Kermack and McKendrick Integro-Differential Equations
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
PCR Testing in the UK During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic – Evidence from FOI Requests
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT