ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Humoral Immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and Inferred Protection from Infection in a French Longitudinal Community Cohort
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Post-covid medical complaints after SARS-CoV-2 Omicron vs Delta variants - a prospective cohort study
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 Booster Effect and Waning Immunity in Hemodialysis Patients
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Assessment of COVID-19 as the Underlying Cause of Death Among Children and Young People Aged 0 to 19 Years in the US
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Hemin shows antiviral activity in vitro , possibly through suppression of viral entry mediators
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Atovaquone for treatment of COVID-19: A prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial
This article has 19 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A Monte Carlo Estimation of the Narrow-Sense Heritability of COVID-19 Infection and Severity from AncestryDNA Survey Data
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical Features and Burden of Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Children and Adolescents
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Diagnostic accuracy of the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen rapid test device for SARS-CoV-2 detection in Kenya, 2021: A field evaluation
This article has 26 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Intranasal vaccination induced cross-protective secretory IgA antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants with reducing the potential risk of lung eosinophilic immunopathology
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT