ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
The cost of the COVID-19 pandemic vs the cost-effectiveness of mitigation strategies in the EU/UK/EEA and OECD countries: a systematic review
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 impacts the transcriptome and epigenome at the maternal-fetal interface in pregnancy
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Response of wastewater-based epidemiology predictor for the second wave of COVID-19 in Ahmedabad, India: A long-term data Perspective
This article has 15 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Accurate prediction of virus-host protein-protein interactions via a Siamese neural network using deep protein sequence embeddings
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Heterogeneous evolution of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in school-age children
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 helicase might interfere with cellular nonsense-mediated RNA decay: insights from a bioinformatics study
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Lineage BA.2 dominated the Omicron SARS-CoV-2 epidemic wave in the Philippines
This article has 33 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Descriptive Epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma (P.1/501Y.V3) variant cases in England, August 2021
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance in Rwanda: Introductions and local transmission of the B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant of concern
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
High mobility group box 1, ATP , lipid mediators, and tissue factor are elevated in COVID ‐19 patients: HMGB1 as a biomarker of worst prognosis
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT