The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Which Measures are Effective in Containing COVID-19? — Empirical Research Based on Prevention and Control Cases in China
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical characteristics of recovered COVID-19 patients with re-detectable positive RNA test
This article has 25 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Risk assessment of progression to severe conditions for patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a single-center retrospective study
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical and Paraclinical Characteristics of COVID-19 patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Understand research hotspots surrounding COVID-19 and other coronavirus infections using topic modeling
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Doubling time tells how effective Covid-19 prevention works
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Extrapolation of Infection Data for the CoVid-19 Virus and Estimate of the Pandemic Time Scale
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Reduced numbers of T cells and B cells correlates with persistent SARS-CoV-2 presence in non-severe COVID-19 patients
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical characteristics associated with COVID-19 severity in California
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genomic surveillance reveals multiple introductions of SARS-CoV-2 into Northern California
This article has 50 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT