ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Risk of COVID-19 among front-line health-care workers and the general community: a prospective cohort study
This article has 83 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Global genetic patterns reveal host tropism versus cross-taxon transmission of bat Betacoronaviruses
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Public knowledge, attitudes and practices towards COVID-19: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 in breast cancer patients: a cohort at the Institut Curie hospitals in the Paris area
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Modeling the Spread of COVID-19 in Lebanon: A Bayesian Perspective
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A Method to Identify the Missing COVID-19 Cases in the U.S. and Results for mid-April 2020
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The geography of COVID-19 spread in Italy and implications for the relaxation of confinement measures
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Paucity and Disparity of Publicly Available Sex-Disaggregated Data for the COVID-19 Epidemic Hamper Evidence-Based Decision-Making
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Characteristics of lymphocyte subsets and their predicting values for the severity of COVID-19 patients
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Probable causes and risk factors for positive SARS‐CoV‐2 test in recovered patients: Evidence from Brunei Darussalam
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT