The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Functional and druggability analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 proteome
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A missense variant effect prediction and annotation resource for SARS-CoV-2
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The impact of mutations on the structural and functional properties of SARS-CoV-2 proteins: A comprehensive bioinformatics analysis
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The relationship between human mobility measures and SAR-Cov-2 transmission varies by epidemic phase and urbanicity: results from the United States
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Development and validation of IMMUNO-COV™: a high-throughput clinical assay for detecting antibodies that neutralize SARS-CoV-2
This article has 27 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Phylogenomic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 genomes from western India reveals unique linked mutations
This article has 17 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Computational prediction of the effect of amino acid changes on the binding affinity between SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and human ACE2
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Identification and validation of 174 COVID-19 vaccine candidate epitopes reveals low performance of common epitope prediction tools
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
VERSO: A comprehensive framework for the inference of robust phylogenies and the quantification of intra-host genomic diversity of viral samples
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT