The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Lactation: Assessment of Adverse Events and Vaccine Related Antibodies in Mother-Infant Dyads
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
An Assessment of Serological Assays for SARS-CoV-2 as Surrogates for Authentic Virus Neutralization
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Lessons Learned From the Resilience of Chinese Hospitals to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Knowledge barriers in a national symptomatic-COVID-19 testing programme
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Detection of SARS-CoV-2-Specific IgA in the Human Milk of COVID-19 Vaccinated Lactating Health Care Workers
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Understanding the effectiveness of government interventions against the resurgence of COVID-19 in Europe
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
No evidence for increased transmissibility from recurrent mutations in SARS-CoV-2
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Factors informing healthcare workers’ willingness to work during the COVID-19 pandemic
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Experimental Evidence for Enhanced Receptor Binding by Rapidly Spreading SARS-CoV-2 Variants
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: A convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT