The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Strong evolutionary convergence of receptor-binding protein spike between COVID-19 and SARS-related coronaviruses
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Impact of booster COVID-19 vaccine for Moroccan adults: A discrete age-structured model approach
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Potential transmission chains of variant B.1.1.7 and co-mutations of SARS-CoV-2
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Can we predict antibody responses in SARS-CoV-2? A cohort analysis
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Reopening Universities without Testing During COVID-19: Evaluating a Possible Alternative Strategy in Low Risk Countries
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: A Systematic Review
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Comparison of methods for predicting COVID-19-related death in the general population using the OpenSAFELY platform
This article has 45 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Estimating SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number by infection location in Japan
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Fast assessment of human receptor-binding capability of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
CROssBAR: comprehensive resource of biomedical relations with knowledge graph representations
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT