The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Identification of common key genes and pathways between Covid-19 and lung cancer by using protein-protein interaction network analysis
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Multicenter Evaluation of a Fully Automated High-Throughput SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Immunoassay
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 variants resist antibody neutralization and broaden host ACE2 usage
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 evolution in animals suggests mechanisms for rapid variant selection
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Determining the risk of developing symptomatic covid-19 infection after attending hospital for radiological examinations: controlled cohort study
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Implications of central carbon metabolism in SARS-CoV-2 replication and disease severity
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Quality control of low-frequency variants in SARS-CoV-2 genomes
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infection in human cardiomyocytes by targeting the Sigma-1 receptor disrupts cytoskeleton architecture and contractility
This article has 26 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT
-
Modeling COVID-19 Nonpharmaceutical Interventions: Exploring periodic NPI strategies
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Computer simulations of the interaction between SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein and different surfaces
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT