The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.

About Followers

Latest preprint reviews

  1. Acceptance and Intake of COVID-19 Vaccines among Older Germans

    1. Marta Malesza
    2. Erich Wittmann

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  2. COVID-19 Vaccination Prioritization on the Basis of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Number Needed to Vaccinate to Prevent Death

    1. Darryl P. Leong
    2. Amitava Banerjee
    3. Salim Yusuf

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  3. Implementation of rapid and frequent SARS-CoV2 antigen testing and response in congregate homeless shelters

    1. Andrés Aranda-Díaz
    2. Elizabeth Imbert
    3. Sarah Strieff
    4. Dave Graham-Squire
    5. Jennifer L. Evans
    6. Jamie Moore
    7. Willi McFarland
    8. Jonathan Fuchs
    9. Margaret A. Handley
    10. Margot Kushel

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  4. The Spike D614G mutation increases SARS-CoV-2 infection of multiple human cell types

    1. Zharko Daniloski
    2. Tristan X Jordan
    3. Juliana K Ilmain
    4. Xinyi Guo
    5. Gira Bhabha
    6. Benjamin R tenOever
    7. Neville E Sanjana

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  5. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of XAV-19, a Swine Glyco-humanized Polyclonal Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody, for COVID-19-Related Moderate Pneumonia: a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIa Study

    1. Benjamin Gaborit
    2. Eric Dailly
    3. Bernard Vanhove
    4. Régis Josien
    5. Karine Lacombe
    6. Vincent Dubee
    7. Virginie Ferre
    8. Sophie Brouard
    9. Florence Ader
    10. Marie-Anne Vibet
    11. Aurélie Le Thuaut
    12. Richard Danger
    13. Laurent Flet
    14. Anne Omnes
    15. Laetitia Berly
    16. Anne Chiffoleau
    17. Alexandra Jobert
    18. Odile Duvaux
    19. François Raffi

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  6. Saliva as a reliable sample for COVID‐19 diagnosis in paediatric patients

    1. Alvina C. Felix
    2. Anderson V. de Paula
    3. Andreia C. Ribeiro
    4. Francini C. da Silva
    5. Marta Inemami
    6. Angela A. Costa
    7. Cibele O. D. Leal
    8. Walter M. Figueiredo
    9. Dmitry J. S. Sarmento
    10. Tatiana A. Sassaki
    11. Claudio S. Pannuti
    12. Paulo H. Braz‐Silva
    13. Camila Malta Romano

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  7. A Quantitative Risk Estimation Platform for Indoor Aerosol Transmission of COVID‐19

    1. Hooman Parhizkar
    2. Kevin G. Van Den Wymelenberg
    3. Charles N. Haas
    4. Richard L. Corsi

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  8. Newcastle disease virus (NDV) expressing the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 as a live virus vaccine candidate

    1. Weina Sun
    2. Sarah R. Leist
    3. Stephen McCroskery
    4. Yonghong Liu
    5. Stefan Slamanig
    6. Justine Oliva
    7. Fatima Amanat
    8. Alexandra Schäfer
    9. Kenneth H. Dinnon
    10. Adolfo García-Sastre
    11. Florian Krammer
    12. Ralph S. Baric
    13. Peter Palese

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    2 evaluationsAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  9. Heterogeneous immunological recovery trajectories revealed in post-acute COVID-19

    1. Yapeng Su
    2. Dan Yuan
    3. Daniel G. Chen
    4. Kai Wang
    5. Jongchan Choi
    6. Chengzhen L. Dai
    7. Sunga Hong
    8. Rongyu Zhang
    9. Jingyi Xie
    10. Sarah Li
    11. Kelsey Scherler
    12. Ana Jimena Pavlovitch-Bedzyk
    13. Shen Dong
    14. Christopher Lausted
    15. Rachel H. Ng
    16. Inyoul Lee
    17. Shannon Fallen
    18. Sergey A. Kornilov
    19. Priyanka Baloni
    20. Venkata R. Duvvuri
    21. Kristin G. Anderson
    22. Jing Li
    23. Fan Yang
    24. Clifford Rostomily
    25. Pamela Troisch
    26. Brett Smith
    27. Jing Zhou
    28. Sean Mackay
    29. Kim Murray
    30. Rick Edmark
    31. Lesley Jones
    32. Yong Zhou
    33. Lee Rowen
    34. Rachel Liu
    35. William Chour
    36. William R. Berrington
    37. Julie A Wallick
    38. Heather A Algren
    39. the ISB-Swedish COVID19 Biobanking Unit
    40. Terri Wrin
    41. Christos J. Petropoulos
    42. Wei Wei
    43. Nathan D. Price
    44. Naeha Subramanian
    45. Jennifer Hadlock
    46. Andrew T. Magis
    47. Antoni Ribas
    48. Lewis L. Lanier
    49. Scott D. Boyd
    50. Jeffrey A. Bluestone
    51. Leroy Hood
    52. Raphael Gottardo
    53. Philip D. Greenberg
    54. Mark M. Davis
    55. Jason D. Goldman
    56. James R. Heath

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity

  10. “Phytopathological strolls” in the dual context of COVID‐19 lockdown and IYPH2020: Transforming constraints into an opportunity for public education about plant pathogens

    1. Frédéric Suffert
    2. Muriel Suffert

    Reviewed by ScreenIT

    1 evaluationAppears in 1 listLatest version Latest activity
Newer Page 2195 of 2361 Older