The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
MRCA time and epidemic dynamics of the 2019 novel coronavirus
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
In-hospital and 30-day mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in England before and after the COVID-19 era
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Antibody responses to endemic coronaviruses modulate COVID-19 convalescent plasma functionality
This article has 29 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Fatal neuroinvasion and SARS-CoV-2 tropism in K18-hACE2 mice is partially independent on hACE2 expression
This article has 20 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Cerebrospinal fluid in COVID-19 neurological complications: Neuroaxonal damage, anti-SARS-Cov2 antibodies but no evidence of cytokine storm
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Early stage COVID-19 disease dynamics in Germany: models and parameter identification
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Widespread testing, case isolation and contact tracing may allow safe school reopening with continued moderate physical distancing: A modeling analysis of King County, WA data
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Landscapes and dynamic diversifications of B-cell receptor repertoires in COVID-19 patients
This article has 37 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 polymerase stalling by remdesivir
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
People Behavior Changes in China during COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT