The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Estimating real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in Israel using aggregated counts
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Accuracy of the Veterans Health Administration COVID-19 (VACO) Index for predicting short-term mortality among 1307 US academic medical centre inpatients and 427 224 US Medicare patients
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Quantitative plasma proteomics of survivor and non-survivor COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital unravels potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Optimizing testing for COVID-19 in India
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mathematical Modeling and Simulation of the COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Recombinant SARS-CoV-2 genomes circulated at low levels over the first year of the pandemic
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by Rapid Reviews Infectious Diseases, ScreenIT
-
Hydrating the respiratory tract: An alternative explanation why masks lower severity of COVID-19
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
CAR-NK Cells Effectively Target SARS-CoV-2-Spike-Expressing Cell Lines In Vitro
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Influenza-negative influenza-like illness (fnILI) Z-score as a proxy for incidence and mortality of COVID-19
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Genomic analysis reveals local transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in early pandemic phase in Peru
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT