The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Untargeted metabolomics of COVID-19 patient serum reveals potential prognostic markers of both severity and outcome
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Rapid increase of Care Homes reporting outbreaks a sign of eventual substantial disease burden
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Antibody Responses in Children With Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) and Mild and Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)
This article has 24 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A cell-free nanobody engineering platform rapidly generates SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing nanobodies
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY
This article has 30 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Comparative evaluation of six immunoassays for the detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Correlation of national and healthcare workers COVID-19 infection data; implications for large-scale viral testing programs
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Discordant neutralizing antibody and T cell responses in asymptomatic and mild SARS-CoV-2 infection
This article has 40 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Covid-19 Cases in India: A Visual Exploratory Data Analysis Model
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Using viral load and epidemic dynamics to optimize pooled testing in resource-constrained settings
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT