The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Prevalence of Occupation Associated with Increased Mobility During COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 4 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Evaluation of Facial Protection Against Close-Contact Droplet Transmission
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
From more testing to smart testing: data-guided SARS-CoV-2 testing choices, the Netherlands, May to September 2020
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Three dimensions of COVID‐19 risk perceptions and their socioeconomic correlates in the United States: A social media analysis
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Characterizing the Qatar advanced-phase SARS-CoV-2 epidemic
This article has 23 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The challenges of the coming mass vaccination and exit strategy in prevention and control of COVID-19, a modelling study
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The role of case importation in explaining differences in early SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics in Canada—A mathematical modeling study of surveillance data
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Interobserver Agreement of Lung Ultrasound Findings of COVID ‐19
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical and Intestinal Histopathological Findings in SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 Patients with Hematochezia
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Potential impact of individual exposure histories to endemic human coronaviruses on age-dependent severity of COVID-19
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT