The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
State-level tracking of COVID-19 in the United States
This article has 53 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A wind speed threshold for increased outdoor transmission of coronavirus: an ecological study
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Expanded COVID-19 phenotype definitions reveal distinct patterns of genetic association and protective effects
This article has 21 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Screening Strategies to Permit the Safe Reopening of College Campuses in the United States
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in children: a prospective multicentre cohort study
This article has 19 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The dynamics of Covid-19: weather, demographics and infection timeline
This article has 1 author:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Circulating cytokines and lymphocyte subsets in patients who have recovered from COVID-19
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data
This article has 25 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Decreasing median age of COVID-19 cases in the United States—Changing epidemiology or changing surveillance?
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Search for trends of Covid-19 infection in India, China, Denmark, Brazil, France. Germany and the USA on the basis of power law scaling
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT