The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
A direct RT-qPCR approach to test large numbers of individuals for SARS-CoV-2
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Strategic Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Serology Testing in a Low Prevalence Setting: The COVID-19 Contact (CoCo) Study in Healthcare Professionals
This article has 22 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Nasopharyngeal Swabs vs. Nasal Aspirates for Respiratory Virus Detection: A Systematic Review
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Do predictors of adherence to pandemic guidelines change over time? A panel study of 22,000 UK adults during the COVID-19 pandemic
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID 19: An SEIR model predicting disease progression and healthcare outcomes for Pakistan
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The Effectiveness of Social Distancing in Mitigating COVID-19 Spread: a modelling analysis
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Equivalent SARS-CoV-2 viral loads by PCR between nasopharyngeal swab and saliva in symptomatic patients
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
A New Screening Method for COVID-19 based on Ocular Feature Recognition by Machine Learning Tools
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Decline in Emergent and Urgent Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
TESTING INFORMED SIR BASED EPIDEMIOLOGICAL MODEL FOR COVID-19 IN LUXEMBOURG
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT