The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Distinctive features of SARS-CoV-2-specific T cells predict recovery from severe COVID-19
This article has 14 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Contact Settings and Risk for Transmission in 3410 Close Contacts of Patients With COVID-19 in Guangzhou, China
This article has 26 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Māori and Pacific People in New Zealand have higher risk of hospitalisation for COVID-19
This article has 9 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Rapid disappearance of influenza following the implementation of COVID-19 mitigation measures in Hamilton, Ontario
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Sensitivity analysis of the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 in Europe
This article has 13 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Time to SARS‐CoV‐2 clearance among patients with cancer and COVID‐19
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Trend prediction of COVID-19 based on ARIMA model in mainland of China
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Role of Intermediate Care Unit Admission and Noninvasive Respiratory Support during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Retrospective Cohort Study
This article has 12 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Mental health condition of college students compared to non-students during COVID-19 lockdown: the CONFINS study
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Serological responses to human virome define clinical outcomes of Italian patients infected with SARS-CoV-2
This article has 23 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT