ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Survival in adult inpatients with COVID-19
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Impact of age, sex, comorbidities and clinical symptoms on the severity of COVID-19 cases: A meta-analysis with 55 studies and 10014 cases
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Remdesivir use in patients with coronavirus COVID-19 disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the Chinese Lancet trial with the NIH trial
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 serology in 4000 health care and administrative staff across seven sites in Lombardy, Italy
This article has 10 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
The transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is likely comodulated by temperature and by relative humidity
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
COVID-19 in Latin America: Contrasting phylodynamic inference with epidemiological surveillance. (Molecular epidemiology of COVID-19 in Latin America)
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Global Lessons and Potential Strategies in Combating COVID-19 Pandemic in Ethiopia: Systematic Review
This article has 11 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Association of Renin Angiotensin System Blockers with Outcomes in Patients with Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Inferring the effective start dates of non-pharmaceutical interventions during COVID-19 outbreaks
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Verification of two alternative do-it-yourself equipment respirator seal as COVID-19 protection (VADERS-CoV) : a quality assessment pilot study
This article has 6 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT