ScreenIT
The Automated Screening Working Groups is a group of software engineers and biologists passionate about improving scientific manuscripts on a large scale. Our members have created tools that check for common problems in scientific manuscripts, including information needed to improve transparency and reproducibility. We have combined our tools into a single pipeline, called ScreenIT. We're currently using our tools to screen COVID preprints.
Latest preprint reviews
-
Smoking and the risk of COVID-19 infection in the UK Biobank Prospective Study
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
On the Progression of COVID-19 in Portugal: A Comparative Analysis of Active Cases Using Non-linear Regression
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Evaluation of the Current Therapeutic Approaches for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and a Meta-analysis
This article has 7 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical performance of the Abbott Panbio with nasopharyngeal, throat, and saliva swabs among symptomatic individuals with COVID-19
This article has 16 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Efficacy of Face Masks Used in Uganda: A Laboratory-Based Inquiry during the COVID-19 Pandemic
This article has 5 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Indirect benefits are a crucial consideration when evaluating SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
SARS-CoV-2 genome diversity at the binding sites of oligonucleotides used for COVID-19 diagnosis
This article has 18 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Predicting the number of reported and unreported cases for the COVID-19 epidemic in South Korea, Italy, France and Germany
This article has 2 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Can pollen explain the seasonality of flu-like illnesses in the Netherlands?
This article has 3 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT
-
Clinical and historical features associated with severe COVID-19 infection: a systematic review
This article has 8 authors:Reviewed by ScreenIT